Please consider the comments of your peers when making a post. In fact I prefer that you reply directly to the last comment posted.
Barack Obama and Joe Biden on Immigration:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/immigration/
John McCain and Sarah Palin on Border Security and Immigration:
http://www.johnmccain.com/Informing/Issues/68db8157-d301-4e22-baf7-a70dd8416efa.htm
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
25 comments:
Both John McCain and Barack Obama have extremely similar views when it comes to immigration policies on border security. In 2006, they both voted on a bill that would put up 700 miles of fencing along the United States-Mexican border. They also both agreed on the idea of a "guest-worker" program. The "guest-worker" program is a program that will allow the somewhat 12 million illegal immigrants that are living in our country to actually become citizens. However, even though both candidates liked this idea, it never had enough support to be ratified.
(http://content.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/issues.aspx?i=2&c=12)
(http://content.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/issues.aspx?i=2&c=11)
I agree with the bill that they both supported in 2006 that would have put up a 700 mile fence on the United States-Mexican border. This would have been a good idea because I believe there needs to be a physical barrier between our two countries. I know that it is not a guarentee to keep illegal immigrants out of our country, but I believe that there has to be some kind of physical border. However, I do not agree with Obama and McCain when they voted in favor of the "guest-worker" program. I do not agree with this program because it is not punishing the illegal immigrants in this country enough. I believe that when they are caught in this country without the proper citizenship documentation, they should be deported back to their own country. That should be their punishment for entering the country illegaly.
John McCain/Sarah Palin and Barack Obama/Joe Biden both have similarities and differences in their plans to combat the immigration deficiencies in this country. I am honestly very impressed by McCain's plan to combat this ever growing problem as it is so detailed and well thought out. I think it could work as long as the money is available to use to employ all of the advanced types of technology that are required to maintain a secure border. I am worried how much this is going to cost our country since it is in much debt, at least in the trillion dollar amounts. Where is all of this money coming from? How is the McCain/Palin team going to fund this extensively expensive project? I think this is a great idea, but it is going from one extreme, with lack of border security, to another, with high tech ideas that drain people’s money t implement border security. I agree with the Obama/Biden plan because it is a more feasible way to tackle the problem. This plan is like taking baby steps in order to correct it. If they have other ideas later on and realize that their initial plan is not working, they can always go back to fix it. I also really liked one of the last ideas on their plan which is to "...put greater emphasis on keeping immigrant families together." http://www.barackobama.com/issues/immigration/ That is what this issue should be about, keeping the families of immigrants together in a respectful way as long as if they want citizenship, they obtain it in the right way, through filling out the necessary paperwork to legally become citizens of the U.S.
I never knew about the guest-worker program and that is one proponent that also must be tackled. I do not see what is so wrong about this idea as long as people who want to become U.S. citizens want to remain in this country and not constantly send money and visit their families back in Mexico or other areas near the U.S. I think that it is great that they want to support their families, but why can't they leave their homes for a better life and come to the U.S.? That is what immigrants have done for hundreds of years that came through Ellis Island and Angel Island. They went to the U.S. first and then went back to their homes so they could bring the rest of their families to the U.S. I think illegal immigrants should establish their homes in the U.S. and then once they are settled as legal immigrants and are financially stable, they can go back to their homes and send for their families to live with them in the U.S., as long as their families therefore get proper legal documentation filled out to become U.S. citizens. Or if that does not suit them, dual citizenship is possible as well. There is nothing wrong with that either.
I also believe the simple idea of putting up a fence has been in place for years and now actually hearing that both political parties' candidates have tried to put that idea into a bill and ratify it is great. It just shows how both candidates are not so different after all and that they do agree on certain issues in the election that need to be dealt with.
I agree with Nick is his opinion for the 700 mile fence. I think that if immigration wasn't such a problem, a 700 mile fence would not be necessary. There is no 700 mile fence between the United States and Canada because the Canadians aren’t trying to sneak into the United States. The fence won’t stop immigrants from coming into the United States but it will lower the numbers coming in. I also agree and disagree with Nick on his view on the guest worker program. I think that by making the illegal immigrants from Mexico citizens is unfair to all immigrants trying to legally come into this country. They followed the rules and have to wait a certain amount of time to get into the United States while someone else can sneak in and if this law is passed, just become a citizen. On the other hand, none of these illegal immigrants pay taxes. If some 12 million people all of a sudden start paying taxes, that may help out the economy. Yet on the other hand, most of these illegal immigrants work in jobs for cash so many of them may keep those jobs that are not taxed. The illegal immigrants may also start to take jobs from Americans rather than doing jobs that Americans don’t want to do if become citizens.
Obama and McCain's plans both address the problem properly, though I do feel that McCain's plan is more detailed and thought out. I like how he wants to use electric employee verification to ensure that employees are U.S. citizens.
On the other hand, going along with what Robin had said, Obama puts a human face to the issue when he talks about reuniting the families. It is important to remember that immigrants are people who are only hear to find better work opportunities to make a better living. I also agree that McCain's plan sounds good but seems expensive. McCain's plan involves a lot of money allocation. You could almost say the plan inovles "throwing money at the problem". Which is probably not the most effective way to solve the issue.
It's great that both candidates have supported building more physical barriers in the past. I would hope that future years bring more innovation and technology to the issue such as more security cameras, aircraft, and sensors along the boarder line.
McCain and Obama's immigration reform policy are both great plans for the future of our border. Each of their proposals have unique highlights and strategies which would implement change. I feel that both plans are an acceptable means to the growing problem with illegal immigrants. I like how both presidential candidates are targeting employer's who seek out immigrant laborers and exploit them in their honest efforts. By eliminating the employer's, illegal immigrants will be more likely to have a chance at a better life by making livable wages and being able to support a family.
Obama's proposal is slightly more appetizing than McCains because parts of McCain's plan seems costly and excessive. Electronic verification seems so futuristic but it may be the solution we need. I feel that so many things could go wrong with relying on technology to live your life. We are already too dependent on our technology which can be manipulated and corrupted in an instance to play such a large role in our ongoing immigration issue.
As for the guest-worker program, i feel this will be used and abused. As Robin noted it would be great to allow people the opportunity to come to America and make a living by working hard and paying taxes. Unfortunately people don't always hold up to their expectations, McCain's plan would be great except i feel once people's time is up they would disappear into the night and be in our country illegally. McCain's plan may work if he is able to implement all aspects of it appropriately without fault.
Other points of importance from both proposals was the reuniting of families. As noted by Tom and Robin the option for families to travel and reunite is crucial. My family came from Russia and had to same dilemma, but was able to come to America after following proper procedure and getting documented.
I agree with both Paul and Nick about the 700 mile fence. The idea that a fence or some sort of barrier will stop incoming illegal immigrants is ludicrous. The U.S. would never have enough man power/ unmanned aerial vehicles to patrol such an expanse. Even if they mustered up the muscle along the border for a physical barrier it would be disastrous because we would focus most of our money in resources in such a minute part of the problem. I agree with McCain that strengthening our technology and tactics (training camps) on the border is a must. There are certain parts of the border that experience higher traffic than others- these are the parts where we should really focus on the loopholes in our security in which the illegal immigrants slip through. I agree with Matt about Electronic Verification, granted yes technology/electronics can be faulty but this country needs a set system in which employers can verify their workers as legal. At this point I am willing to take my chances with an Electronic Verification System because the bureaucratic system that’s in place now is vastly dysfunctional, unorganized, and completely useless due to their backlog of many different cases and types of information. I liked Obama’s idea of working with Mexico to promote better economic development. There are a lot of ways to tackle the immigration problem but aside from looking at our country we have to look outside to see what’s pushing people out of their country. This of course would take some time but if Mexico’s economy did improve there might be incentives for illegal immigrants to return back to Mexico as well as lighten the flow of them entering the United States illegally. Aside from this they both go on to express the importance of keeping a family intact. They both have plans to due away with the backlog of those waiting for a green card and helping those who are illegal clear their name and start on a legal process towards citizenship. Robin makes a good point,where are we going to the money for all of this border security and immigration adjustment? Unfortunately enough it will most likely be coming right out of our pockets with higher taxes. While I agree that Obama seems to have a more cost effective plan at the moment I also believe that we still need to put some money towards some of the things that McCain had laid out for his security plan like training facilities and technologies. Both McCain and Obama have similar goals in this immigration debate it will be interesting to see how much funding goes into actual border security and whether or not we can try to work with other countries like Mexico to strengthen their economic development.
I agree with what many people are already saying. The Obama/Biden and McCain/Palin views on the immigration platform are very similar. Both candidates Would like to secure the border better. Both caandidates are for 700 miles of fencing which will help deter some immigrants from crossing illegaly. McCain/Palin however wants to find sources of money for all border states to put up new training stations and new ways of technology to monitor the border. Although I agree with Robin in wondering where all the new funding would come from I think we will need more then a wall to keep illegal immigrants from crossing the border.
Both Obama and McCain would like to see families stay together. This is a good thing to allow the families of legal citizens to cross the border to keep them together. Both parties also understand that their are jobs that are primarilly held by illegal immigrants. Obama would like to up the number of legal immigrants in this country to continue to have the man power to fill these jobs. One issue both candidates agree on is punishing employers for hiring illegal immigrants. Obama feels that allowing more legal immigrants to fill the job will solve the issue. McCain on the other hand would like to establish a verification system that would tell employers immediatly if a person is legal in this country. Again I agree with Robin on this one and wonder where we will find the funding for this program.
One of the issues that Obama/Biden suggested as an answer to having less illegal immigrants in our country would be to help improve the economic development in Mexico to improve living conditions and keep people in their home country. This sounds nice on paper but the U.S is suffering enough with our own economy right now and I believe we should work on improving our economy before we start fixing other countries economies.
I agree with Nick who posted before me in that I feel Obama and McCain have proposed very similar plans involving immigration specifically from Mexico. I do how ever differ in that I feel a 700 mile fence is a terribly silly idea and a complete waste of money. Adding security to our county's border is important but I don't see how a fence is going to do much. I think the "guest-worker" idea is very important. We already have a large number of undocumented immigrants living here and we need a plan to deal with that situation as much as we need to deal with tightening our borders.
When reviewing the policies Barack Obama and John McCain have on immigration, I find some similarities. I like the fact that John McCain has a well though out plan on how to combat illegal immigration. As someone had posted before though, this does seem very expensive, and funding would would be a main issue. Barack Obama's view on keeping the families together is what really makes me agree with his policy. I do believe that family life should be a main issue when looking into immigration. Many immigrants do come here to have a better life, and to support their families. The "guest-worker" policy is a great idea, and I believe that the government should put more funding into this. Many immigrant s do just come here to work and at the end of certain seasons go to back to their homelands. A main problem is that just not everyone goes back, and that's why Americans are having ill feelings towards immigration. Whom ever does win the election I hope they tackle this issue, and do what is best for everyone, American citizens and for the immigrants coming here for economic opportunity.
When reviewing the policies Barack Obama and John McCain have on immigration, I find some similarities. I like the fact that John McCain has a well though out plan on how to combat illegal immigration. As someone had posted before though, this does seem very expensive, and funding would would be a main issue. Barack Obama's view on keeping the families together is what really makes me agree with his policy. I do believe that family life should be a main issue when looking into immigration. Many immigrants do come here to have a better life, and to support their families. The "guest-worker" policy is a great idea, and I believe that the government should put more funding into this. Many immigrant s do just come here to work and at the end of certain seasons go to back to their homelands. A main problem is that just not everyone goes back, and that's why Americans are having ill feelings towards immigration. Whom ever does win the election I hope they tackle this issue, and do what is best for everyone, American citizens and for the immigrants coming here for economic opportunity.
I was surprised to find that the Democratic and Republic platforms were incredibly similar. I like the stance that the Democrats have taken in admitting that the immigration system is broke and that changes need to be made in order to fix it. A huge reason that illegal immigrants come into the country is because the wait to do it legally is too long and costly. According to Obama, when the Borough of Immigration is fixed then there will be a lesser incentive for immigrants to come in illegally. Also, immigrants seeking admittance into America are sometimes separated from families. By fixing the system by employing more officials, having quicker background checks, and making immigration an easier process overall, families can stay together. McCain has the same prerogative when it comes to the subject of families and immigration as Obama. He thoroughly believes families need to be re-united.
Matt somewhat disliked the idea of using a more advanced technological system of identifying a worker's identity. I disagree with his perspective on this McCain objective. As immigrants devise newer and more technological ways of avoiding border security and background checks, the more technological advanced we need to become in order to gain the upper hand. If we can develop a cost effective way to check an identity of a worker and subject businesses to conducting these checks then we can limit the hiring of illegal immigrants. It will also discourage people from thinking that the only thing they have to worry about is getting across the border and securing false documents.
I am impressed with Obama's immigration platform because it is concise, addresses problems such as what to do with illegal people already here, and finally will make immigration a safer process.
With McCain and the Republican party it seems that they have more of a breakdown of what to do with each different group of workers like agricultural and non agricultural. He also is not afraid of taking technological risks to solve the immigration problem and finally puts fault with businesses that knowingly employ illegal immigrants.
I feel on this issue alone the American public can not go wrong with either candidate because they both are in agree on securing the borders first and making illegal immigration a thing of the past.
As several have mentioned in previous comments, the positions of both the Democratic Party as well as the Republican Party are very similar regarding the issue of immigration. It is clear that the issue of immigration to both Obama and McCain is something very real in America; in both the present as well as in the past. Since 2000, there has been an increase of over 40 percent of undocumented immigrants flooding into the United States.
In order to solve this problem, both parties came up with platforms, while both men have their own ideas—McCain seems much more thorough and costly. Obama and McCain both realize the importance of family and the reunification of them. Another key point is the fact that many of these immigrants take on the job that many Americans are unwilling to have. While both men see the importance of the immigrants coming into the United States both realize it should be done legally.
I agree with Ronald in the fact that with both candidates America cannot go wrong simply because both see the importance of securing the border. Both men realize the importance of establishing a system in order to stop so many undocumented immigrants coming over into America. However, I agree with Obama’s platform a bit more because it seems more realistic and capable of achieving. I feel that McCain’s thorough idea seems far-fetched to achieve since our economy is doing so poorly at this time it would be difficult to find the funding to accomplish all that he plans.
By now it's obvious, both platforms are very similar. What hasn't been addressed by many of us is which one has more potential for success. Before I dive into that, however, it is probably necessary to explain that having illegal immigrant workers, contrary to illegal immigrant criminals is actually more of a plus for the economy rather than detrimental to your common U.S citizen. Any economist or anthropologist would agree. With that said, I feel that while I would rather see Obama's actions go into effect, I believe it is McCain's that would be more effective if implemented correctly.
I feel that the McCain-Palin plan to allow immigrants in on a work-stay basis according to the flexibility of the job market weighed with the rest of the economy proves to be more feasible and practical for us. Most obviously either of these two parties has a lot of cleaning up to do with the country, but this is one "problem" that will not go away until our economy is weaker than Mexico's. McCain's bracketed system of high skilled and low skilled laborers would cause a more acceptable class of immigrants (and by acceptable, I mean more likely to be accepted by the general U.S populace) who would be required to be somewhat educated within their field and educated well in the English language.
As I said, the more attractive of the two to me is Obama's platform, but I feel that McCain's is the more powerful and potent of the two. Yes, it may be more expensive and less practical but I find it to be the better, however less attractive than the counter.
I, along with everyone else agree that both policies are similar in content. However, neither introduce fresh ideas that haven't been introduced previously. The problem now lies in implementing those plans. I admire the fact that both policies acknowledge the tremendous backlogs that exist. People immigrate illegally simply because it is easier that way for them. If they were to do it the virtuous way, they would get no where.
I believe these backlogs need to be addressed immediately. Also, I believe that attempting to round up illegal immigrants to send them home would be fruitless. As they have done in the past, they will turn around and come right back. So, money will have been spent and a problem will remain unsolved.
Securing our borders has proven quite difficult. Most of these illegal immigrants are fleeing from abhorrent conditions and many are willing to risk their lives to escape them. A fence most likely will not stop them. They find other ways around it. I also find it interesting that as many would agree, a reason for securing our borders is so that we may have an understanding as to who we have living amongst us as well as to be sure that we do not allow threats to our security to enter our borders. However, I find it interesting that the class has yet to mention Canada. I understand that they aren't as big of a part of the issue at hand, but it is equally as important.
Another issue we must address regarding immigration is what to do with women who come into the country to give birth so that their child is a citizen. Naturally, we cannot send their child to Mexico because they are a U.S. citizen, but we can't leave them without caretakers either.
I contend that the best way to tackle the issue of illegal immigration is to eliminate backlogs and create a system in which people can attain their citizenship rather than relying upon a broken system.
As stated by my peers both plans share a very similar view on securing our border from illegal immigrants. HannaK made a very good point in that both plans address the backlog in the immigration process and it seems like a priority that both parties should address. These people are waiting to enter our country for almost 20 years deserve the chance to enter the country rather then the slew of illegals that cross the border each year. There’s always been “plans” in place dealing with immigration from the legal and illegal stand point. I feel as though it is necessary for these “plans” to be put in effect and work efficiently to address the needs of our nation. There’s no way to deport all the illegals that are already here I feel as though if they are given citizen ship there wages will then be taxed and some money will be staying here stateside. Both candidates make a strong point that these illegals should be addressed and put at the back of the line to get a green card. I also agree that those who have been waiting to get there green card should receive it first. The legal immigration process needs to be quickened up, its like your sitting in a traffic jam on the parkway or rt.3 you’ll doing anything to get around what’s slowing you down from getting to your destination. These illegals are just finding the quickest way here; maybe if we as a nation opened up some more lanes, we wouldn’t have people trying to bypass our system. Its vital to have a background check to assure the safety of the nation and the people that we are letting in. Both candidates make similar promises and have similar ideas when addressing the problem, like many others that have held office before them. But who is going to step up and really try and address this problem. Our boarders are so vast that it’s difficult for us to constantly have a watchful eye on them. If we speed up the green card process and grant people the opportunity of a better life, we will maybe see the decline in illegal immigrants. And in turn be able to focus on all the illegal trafficking off goods and drugs going on over state lines which strains our economy as much as illegal immigration does.
As stated earlier, Mccain and Obamas policies seem to be quite similar. They both agreed on the idea of a guest-worker program which is a program that will allow millions of illegal immigrants that are here in out country now to finally become US citizens.
The idea of putting up an actual fence to keep illegal immigrants out is not what we need to invest in. There are many ways around a fence and I think the idea is just plain outdated.
Some of Mccains suggestions seem to require a little more financial aid than that of Obamas. However, they look like more of a quick fix and do not look like they may be more effective in the long run. Obama puts faith in his plans and if everything runs the way he envisions it, it might be better for the future of our nation.
As stated earlier, Mccain and Obamas policies seem to be quite similar. They both agreed on the idea of a guest-worker program which is a program that will allow millions of illegal immigrants that are here in out country now to finally become US citizens.
The idea of putting up an actual fence to keep illegal immigrants out is not what we need to invest in. There are many ways around a fence and I think the idea is just plain outdated.
Some of Mccains suggestions seem to require a little more financial aid than that of Obamas. However, they look like more of a quick fix and do not look like they may be more effective in the long run. Obama puts faith in his plans and if everything runs the way he envisions it, it might be better for the future of our nation.
I agree with Terence and feel that McCain and Obama have very similar views on immigration. I agree that illegal immigration is hurting our country. Majority of immigrants want to live in America, but we only let in so many people at one time. Some changes need to be made in order to control our overwhelming problem. I feel both candidates have good plans in mind, but implementing them may be a challenge. I also agree that illegal immigrants should be sent back to their native country if they are caught. If I got cought doing something illegal in their country I would be punished too. I also feel that the government needs to take care of the illegal immigrants we have livng in our country now. The guest-worker plan sounds like it could possibly work and so far I haven't heard anything better. Overall, I feel that we are always going to have some sort of immigration problem.
After reading the candidates' stands on immigration and border control it seems like they discussed with each other about their ideas because most of their major points on the subject are quite similar. After reading everyones comments it seems that everyone feels that both of these plans are similar. I like how Terrence states that even though there are illegals here, we can still turn it into a semi positive by making them citizens and taxing their wages. I feel that this is a good idea and could help out more than deporting, but then again their known as "illegal immigrants" for a reason, because they broke the law and came here without the permission of the United States. I like how Nick commented on a 700 mile fence to put up some type of obstruction against the illegal immigration. I also like Paul's response to the 700 mile fence idea when he said "if immigration wasn't such a problem, a 700 mile fence would not be necessary".
My favorite point from both McCain and Obama's plans are that they are not just looking to stop illegal immigration, but they both say they will go after the employers of illegal immigrants. I feel this is a great idea because if the illegal immigrants can't get a job then they won't have money and if they are unable to make money or a living here then it will motivate them to either stay in their country or come here legally. I think they should however cut back some of the time it takes to become a legalized citizen because that also adds fuel for them to try to get into the country illegally. I also hope that come January, when whoever wins this election in November, takes office they actually take a stand and try to help fix this immigration problem.
Responding to what everyone has said- you're right- the policies do seem quite similar, but then again that's because they are good ideas and during election season they are numerous as repetition of songs during Christmas. I liked the idea of accommodating the migrant workers. For many people who come seasonally into the US- immigration is not on their mind, but rather a temporary stay. I think addressing these people- who don't necessarily want to make America home for more than a short-term is an effective way to keep track and control an important aspect of our borders. Responding to Larry's comment- you're so right. As any kid who has ever jumped a fence, or thief in the night with some sturdy shears can tell you- a fence is not the world most ingenious deterrent system when there is something worthwhile on the other side. I think McCain was much more detailed in his main ideas, which really helped me understand just what he was looking to achieve. From high-skilled jobs for Americans first, immigrants second idea is commonly overlooked, as we think of lower-skilled opportunities for new residents of the country. The technological aspects of his plan were a great addition that was lacking in Obama's. Overall, as with any politician, you have to take their plans of grandeur with a grain of salt- while it looks good on our screens, we have to think realistically about what will actually get accomplished. Best of luck to whoever has the task of implementing these ideas!
I believe, just as most others, that both men have similiar platforms on this issue. John McCain and Sarah Palin's plan is definitly more thorough and has a better chance of working in this country.
First, many of my peers are concerned with undocumented immigrants obtaining a green card before those who went through the legal process of obtaining a green card. McCain specifically notes that the backlogs of prospective American immigrants are to be dealt with before undocumented immigrants. As a second generation American, my mother, her parents, and her sister immigrated here from Edinburgh, Scotland. The classes, evidence of skills, health examinations, and other processes regarded in documented immigration is extensive. Since my family had to embark on this process, I believe that everyone should have to.
However, I am realistic, and realize that ample evidence provides that undocumented workers provide economic incentives for the United States. Obama claims that we should work with Mexico to enhance their economy, which is not a bad idea - but I think it is unrealistic, since we are having problems stimulating our own economy (especially this week). I look at McCain's address to undocumented workers favorably, because it requires undocumented workers to enroll in a program. It is inevitable that there may be undocumented workers - I compare this program to becoming a teacher in New Jersey. If you want to be a teacher, the traditional way is during your undergraduate career - puruse the education program and student teaching. However, for those who have circumstances that make it impossible to do student teaching and the education program in their undergraduate career - there is the alternate route option. I believe that McCain's programs for undocumented workers is more comprehensive than Obama's plan.
Hannak explained that one problem that the United States faces with undocumented immigrants is the situation that may occur when an undoumented immigrant has a child on American soil. Both candidates pledge to keep families together and to reform the immigration process to be more efficient and humane.
I also agree with Nick, I believe a 700 mile fence would be our best bet to slowing the flow of ILLEGAL immigrants into this country. Though there is no real possible way to keep them out this will help keep most out. Our border police need relief in this never ending battle to keep illegals out. I agree with both the Democratic and Republican platforms because they are very similar in ways but one thing I do not agree with is the guest work program. The guest work program is only adding more illegal immigrants to this country and giving away more American jobs. We have turned the other cheek for way to long when it comes to illegal immigrants and we have lost control of it. I believe that the Republicans and Democrats need to work together on getting this wall up and to build up our border control. With the technology we have today(night vision, motion sensors, infrared cameras) we should be stopping them miles negore they even get close to the border. I believe this isnt only our problem ether, the Mexican government should be taking some responsibility in this matter seeing how it is there citizens that are coming into our country. They should help pay/build this 700 mile wall.
I think that the 700 mile wall is a an outrageous idea and that it will never work. There are areas of the border that already have fences and it doesn't work now. If you wanna build a fence you might as well build it underground to stop the tunneling and drugs being brought in through these tunnels. I believe that a major problem is that we are not aloud to use lethal force. Mexicans come over the border with weapons and use them on us and when we use force back it is our Border Patrolmen that are sitting behind bars. Border Patrol should be authorized to use lethal force in any situation where they feel their lives are on the line. The guest work program should be scrapped because that is only making things worse. In order to immigrate into America the test standards need to be raised as well. English should be known in order to become a citizen. As for employers, they will always higher illegal Mexicans or other illegal immigrants and pay them under the table. The fines on this need to be raised to were employers face mandatory jail time and strict fines.
I think a wall on the border is a little extreme; and I do not think it would be very helpful in the long run. If people are that desperate to come into our country for whatever reason, they will do whatever they can. I have a cousin who is a Border Patrol in Arizona and once caught 40 people tunneling underground, it was astounding. I heard on the news that there are border patrols who actually let people come over the border multiple times to work, then return, no questions asked. I think that given the numbers of people who are entering illegally, actions should be taken to see who is in this country to make a living, work on making sure they become legal citizens, and see that they even work legally, as opposed to "under the table." As for the people who come here just to "take advantage of the system," and are not doing anything to help the country, should be deported or punished. It is not fair to taxpayers to support illegal immigrants when many people in this country who are citizens have trouble supporting themselves. It is great that both Obama and McCain want to control this, because it shows that it is not an issue of either party but something the country as a whole has to deal with because it does effect everyone.
See i believe that maybe being a first generation immigrant my perseption is a little diffrent than most. I think that what needs to be done is an expnasion of visas so the need to run the border is reduced. The United STates rations are absurd simply because if it were not for US international policy many developing countries would not be so finacial restrainted and that would in fact reduce the need to migrate.
Post a Comment